Most Salesforce teams eventually hit the same wall: reporting is inconsistent, definitions drift, and the people who “know what that field means” spend their time answering one-off questions instead of improving the system.
So you start a data dictionary.
Then it stalls.
The good news is the failure patterns are predictable, and so are the fixes. Below is a practical playbook based on what we see in high-maturity Salesforce orgs: why data dictionary projects break down, and three shortcuts that get you to an accurate, adopted, and maintained dictionary without turning it into a failed project.
Many teams try to distribute documentation across the org. The intent is good, but progress slows fast because no one is accountable to set standards, decide what gets documented first, and keep the work moving.
This typically creates:
A typical Salesforce org has thousands of fields across objects, automations, integrations, and managed packages. If your approach is “we’ll document everything, manually” scope explodes and consistency falls apart.
This is where teams get stuck:
Even if you finish a first version, Salesforce does not stand still. New fields show up, old ones linger, and meaning changes over time. Without a maintenance process, the dictionary becomes outdated and untrusted very fast.
AI, reporting, and RevOps initiatives amplify these failures because they scale the impact of inconsistent definitions. If the “source of truth” is outdated, then everything downstream inherits that confusion.
This does not mean one person writes every definition.
It means one person is accountable as the lead, responsible for keeping the project moving and the dictionary reliable:
Ideal owners (depending on your org):
What to do this week
Documenting fields from scratch never scales. A faster approach is to pre-load entries using existing metadata and consistent templates, then refine through review.
A “pre-load then approve” workflow looks like this:
This dramatically:
If your biggest blocker is the sheer scale of undocumented fields, Arovy Bulk AI Documentation (via Arovy Data Dictionary) is designed to help you generate documentation across hundreds or thousands of fields in a few clicks, instead of going field-by-field.
What matters for real-world rollout:
That makes it a practical implementation of “pre-load, then approve”: generate a baseline quickly, then let your owner and stakeholders review and edit the smaller subset that actually needs human nuance.
Even with bulk capabilities, it's important to initially narrow your scope and prioritize.
A simple prioritization model:
Maintenance is as hard as initial creation. The only sustainable path is to make the dictionary part of a lightweight operating rhythm.
Minimum viable operating rhythm: monthly (or every two weeks if your org changes fast)
Each cycle, review and manage:
Then drive adoption by making updates visible to the teams who rely on it:
A dictionary becomes far more valuable when other systems can consume it, not just humans reading a page.
With Arovy's Data Dictionary API, teams to can feed other systems (e.g. data warehouse, analytics tools, and AI) with their trusted data dictionary metadata.
Most data dictionary projects fail because they are under-owned, over-scoped, and under-operated.
Fix those three things and you get a dictionary that teams actually use, and one that stays accurate as Salesforce changes. That foundation is what makes reporting more reliable, governance more practical, and AI initiatives successful.
If you want to see Arovy in action, start a free trial: https://www.arovy.com/free-trial